首页 > English > Case > Classic Cases >

CASES

The defendant Chou Hai Ying counterfeit registered trademark

Date:2014-12-25Source:Shanghai Fuan law firmView:194time

The Supreme People's Court issued five IP infringement and fake and shoddy goods of four typical cases: the defendant Chou Hai Ying counterfeit registered trademark case

The Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Hohhot City Intermediate People's court found: 2008 to July April, the defendant Chou Hai Ying, Cui Liuzhi, Yan Shuangquan, Yan Qingwen, Huang Xueli without the consent of the owner of a registered trademark of Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Limited by Share Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the Erie company) license, investment is common in South County in Henan province Qian Kou Xiang Qian Kou village, ice cream products co production of counterfeit registered trademark "Qiao Le Zi" (box), a total of 117571 pieces of counterfeit registered trademark "cartoon" (big pudding) of ice cream products a total of 3947 pieces (box), illegal business amount about 3119998 yuan. Five the defendant's conduct also violated the Erie company to the above two kind of product appearance design patent right. In the meantime, Chou Hai Ying and defendant Yan MW cooperation, without the owner of a registered trademark of Inner Mongolia Mengniu Dairy (Group) Limited by Share Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the company Mengniu) permit, in the ice cream product Nanle County of Henan province Qian Kou Xiang Qian Kou Cun processing production of counterfeit registered trademark "green heart" of a total of 110855 pieces (box), illegal business amount about 1773680 yuan. Two the defendant's conduct also violated company Mengniu on the product appearance design patent right.

Hohhot City Intermediate People's court found the defendant Chou Hai Ying, Cui Liuzhi, Yan Shuangquan, Yan Qingwen, Yan Huang of MW, constitute the crime of counterfeiting registered trademarks and counterfeit patent crime, according to the law the felony to counterfeit registered trademark crime. According to the circumstances of the crime and the status of the defendant's role in the crime, in accordance with the law were sentenced to imprisonment ranging from five years to two years and six months, fined 2446839 yuan to 311999.80 yuan fine ranging. After the verdict, the defendant did not appeal the verdict per person, has the legal effect.

Our Clients